The Dirty Sack of Lying Dog Poop Admits it!

The Dirty Sack of Lying Dog Poop Admits it!

 The dirty sack of lying dog poop, or prominent New York Politician, those two terms are interchangeable, admits that he sent a young lady, who is not his wife, a picture of his wiener area. More than a week after the news was out and after a long list of poorly crafted and very poorly delivered lies, distortions and misrepresentations he admits what everyone already knew.

How did we already know this? It was obvious. As a prominent New York Politician he’s already suspect because of his environment. It’s not possible to gain prominence in a world of sleazy behavior without having lower than normal ethics. His attempt to avoid responsibility for his actions was not very effective. Lame excuses that places the blame for poor behavior on others, is not even at the level of “the dog ate my homework”.

When you as a public figure, with questionable moral fiber, make a public statement, I will listen carefully and look at your body language as you speak. Knowing that you’re ethically challenged before you even open your mouth, I’ll pay very close attention and anticipate your lies, distortions and misrepresentations. All of the facts point to you as the guilty party. When you start the tap dance and attempt to avoid accountability for your actions, you better do a good dance.

There is one problem you have in a situation like this. As a dirty sack of lying dog poop, you rarely act on your own. The handlers and advisers that wind you up and stand you in front of the media on occasion could not participate in your poorly crafted attempted cover up. You would have to confess to them and you can’t do that because then they’ll know, and they would leak it to the media. With your limited skills and abilities you had to tap dance by yourself. You appeared to be a physically challenged nerd being asked to be the starting pitcher for game seven of the World Series.

Limited skills lead to poor results. Your attempted cover up was almost certainly as poor as your performance in your elected position. It appeared magnified in this situation because the spotlight was on you.

Actions have consequences. Public figures who insist on standing before the people of the United States and pass judgment on others and their actions and behaviors, must behave in a manner that can not be questioned. Why should I offer you any credibility when you offer your opinion about a serious public debate, if I know your wife can’t turn her back on you?

Integrity is a quality that demands credibility. When I see a man or a woman who is willing to stand by their words and deeds in life I feel that they can be trusted to make statements and offer their opinions in a world that needs quality people making statements and offering opinions. Public figures should do that. The public should listen and decide whether to believe that public figure.

As an elected official you must vote on important matters for the public good. You must vote on how our public resources are consumed. Your opinion matters in how the countries limited resources will be consumed. Your lack of integrity and honor cause me to question your opinion.

I am less offended by your deplorable conduct involving a young woman who was not your wife. (Your words are meaningless since you violate your marriage vows) I am far more concerned by your conduct in your poorly crafted and delivered attempted cover up. Let me list the reasons why I am so offended by you:

  • Poor problem solving skills, when this event became public you were unable to understand the severity of the problem and identify adequate solutions to the problem.
  • Poor decision making skills, when you wet your pants (and a weiner like you almost certainly wet your pants when you saw your boxers in the national press) you came to all the wrong conclusions and took all of the wrong actions.
  • Very poor acting skills, when you made your lame attempts to avoid responsibility you did it so poorly you could not convince anyone you were innocent. Your poor delivery and lame excuses only convicted you more.
  • Poor judgment, the inability to be able to see the best way out was to confess early and to confess completely is a clear indicator that you lack the judgment required in your chosen profession.

While you low moral character does offend me, I could get past that if you had the skills to be effective in your elected position. Your poor quality as a man, as a husband and as an elected official disqualifies you for any position of responsibility.

Your refusal to resign office only shows what a dirty sack of lying dog poop you really are. The only positive sign is that when the voters reject you, and they will, you will know why. Your poor behavior and poor judgment will cost you the next election.

About gino984

A well fed middle aged male with strong opinions and a sense of humor. I was a Commissioned Officer in the United States Army Military Police Corps. I also spent some years in manufacturing management in both union and non union environments. I know how to lead and how to supervise. I also know how to share what I know. My degree is in Criminal Justice so that means I have a background in Psychology and Sociology. When you couple my Law Enforcement and Security training and experience with my education and experience in management and leadership you get a unique view on Supervision and Leadership.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to The Dirty Sack of Lying Dog Poop Admits it!

  1. Mike says:

    Gino, glad to see your coming out of your shell

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s